Skip to main content

The Congress-Inflicted Student Loan Debacle

Press play to listen to the podcast audio or scroll to read the post

Speaking of having more fun than anyone else you know… Making cash donations to worthy causes is something that helps you do just that. Head on over to and donate a few bucks to one of the organizations listed there. Thanks!

Now on with the show…

Tell me if you can imagine the following… A guy sees a problem. He goes about fixing the problem by throwing a bunch of money at it. That action creates another problem – a new, enormous money problem. Enormous, as in $1.6 Trillion or about 7.5% of GDP. He then says he wants to fix this newly created problem by throwing even more money at it.

You’re wondering who’d be dumb enough to do something like that, right?

Congress, that’s who. Mind you now, this was all done for a genuinely legitimate and extremely noble cause. The modern economy demands that we as a nation are highly educated. The modern economy runs on advanced and specialized knowledge, which means that the most knowledgeable organizations and countries will be best-positioned to compete effectively. It made – and still does make – perfect sense for the federal government to address the higher education issue to help get the right learning delivered to the right people at the right time in the most effective manner possible.

Does that mean blindly throwing money at it with no consideration of unintended consequences? I don’t think so. But… that is, in fact, exactly what Congress did. Repeatedly. Over a period of decades. And what most of the current presidential hopefuls are urging us to do again, only this time on a much grander scale.

The very first federal student loan program was the modest National Defense Education Act of 1958. Congress didn’t really begin throwing its weight around until the late 80s when federal student loan guarantees became the vote-getting thing to do. If you’re interested in all the gory legislative detail, check out this History of student loans.

The key point to remember here is that the goal of all this legislation was and is to make higher education affordable to everyone regardless of their ability to pay for it. As I said, it’s all aimed at a genuinely legitimate and extremely noble cause. But maybe in their zeal to do good for we citizens, Congress forgot about reality. Maybe just maybe they forgot to consider basic economics and human nature – what I like to call the The Big Three Ss of Reality:

  • Supply and Demand
  • Self-Interest
  • Stupidity

Allow me to be a bit more blunt… Congress totally ignored the very basics of the Law of Supply and Demand.

Congress served its own self-interest by passing at least 19 bills they proudly touted as “making higher education more affordable,” when in fact what they did was subsidize the banking industry. At the same time they totally ignored the fact that lending institutions, colleges and universities would respond to this legislation to serve their own self-interest.

And finally… Congress totally ignored the painfully obvious fact that students would make stupid decisions when spending what looks exactly like OPM – Other People’s Money

Let’s dive into Supply and Demand. Economists, like Politicians, are hell bent on convincing us that they’re smarter than the average bear. That Economics is complex and difficult to understand. That being an effective Economist requires a superior intellect – like their own – not like yours or mine.

This mind-set leads to obfuscation; taking the simple and making it complicated. The Law of Supply and Demand provides a terrific example. Here’s how whatever economist wrote the Wikipedia entry describes it:

“In microeconomics, supply and demand is an economic model of price determination in a market. It postulates that, holding all else equal, in a competitive market, the unit price for a particular good, or other traded item such as labor or liquid financial assets, will vary until it settles at a point where the quantity demanded (at the current price) will equal the quantity supplied (at the current price), resulting in an economic equilibrium for price and quantity transacted.” continued below

Subscribe for exclusive content and updates

Got that?

Here’s an alternative, Intentionally Vicarious way of describing Supply and Demand. If something really expensive is suddenly available for a really low price, people will immediately buy a whole lot more of it. Conversely, If the price of something that has always been really low suddenly leaps way up, people will buy a whole lot less of it.

Take Rolls Royce for example. Right now, you can buy a basic, stripped down model for about $312,000. The base price for the flashier models starts at $450,000. They sell around 4,000 of these vehicles per year.

What would happen to demand if the price for a Rolls suddenly dropped to the average for a new car? To around $37,000? You know exactly what would happen… You, me and several million other people would run out and buy one.

On the other hand, how many Ford Fusions would get sold if their price suddenly jumped to $300,000? The answer, of course, is obvious – ZERO. There… You really do understand the basics of Supply and Demand.

Now let’s apply this to student loans. Up until 1958, and effectively until the late 80s, Supply and Demand regulated their price and availability. Then, Congress began to aggressively implement federal student loan guarantees. This very dramatically decreased both the cost and the risk of making these loans for the lending institutions. Exactly as you’d expect, as the cost and risk plummeted, the loan volume and the number of less qualified borrowers skyrocketed.

In 20 years, here’s what has happened:

  • The volume of student loans jumped from $45 Billion annually to $100 Billion annually.
  • Total student loan debt outstanding went up by a factor of 40! From $40 Billion to $1.6 trillion! (And yes, my friends, these are inflation adjusted numbers.)
  • Default rates went from around 5% to around 11%

Again, it’s exactly what you’d expect given the Law of Supply and Demand, the first of my Three Ss of Reality. Congressional tinkering with the student loan business more than doubled the amount of federal student loans available annually, which caused more than twice the amount of money to get borrowed each year, with more than twice the default rate, and 40 times the total amount of student debt piled up. $1.6 Trillion.

Now let’s look at the second S, Self-Interest. All the students and their parents who borrowed money for education were certainly pursuing their own self-interest. No surprise there, but who else has been pursuing their own self-interest?

First and foremost, the politicians. They claim credit for helping thousands of their constituents in pursuing the American Dream via higher education. That means we should give them more campaign donations so they can get re-elected and do even more wonderful things. Do they give a crap if those loans get paid back? No, they do not. Their constituents want the loan – Right now! – and they want the vote – Right now! Handing out cash is all that matters. Paying it back is someone else’s problem for another day.

Next in line are the lenders. Let’s pretend we are in the business of lending money. Since we need to earn a profit to stay in business, we’re very picky about to whom we lend. Unlike the politicians, we need to be pretty sure the borrower will pay us back both principal and interest on a timely basis. We want all kinds of personal financial statements and we do all kinds of credit checks to ensure that will happen.

But wait! The Federal Government is guaranteeing a whole pantload of student loans! Our risk on these loans has dropped to ZERO! We can now very aggressively pursue our own self-interest and loan out as much as we possibly can. Golly whiz, thank you, Congress! We couldn’t have come up with a better way to subsidize the banking industry ourselves!

And then there are those other lenders out there who are not as ethical as we are. They’ll pursue their own self-interest in ways that are more than just a little bit shady. They’ll lie, cheat and steal as much as they can. They’ll mislead every student borrower they can get their hands on, knowing that the full faith and credit of the United States Federal Government is behind what would otherwise be terribly, unacceptably risky loans.

Any more self-interested parties at this party? Yup! How about the colleges and universities? That’s where all the cash ultimately lands, right? Let’s follow the money!!! And let’s remember Supply and Demand. All of a sudden, cash-laden students are coming out of the woodwork. Demand for higher education spikes. Well surprise of surprises, colleges jack up the price!

If you think health care costs have shot up faster than anything else in USA, you-are-wrong. Take a look at the graph to the right. Health care is nothing – it’s a bargain – compared to college tuition and textbooks. From 1988 to 2019, inflation-adjusted average tuition and fees more than doubled at public two-year and private, nonprofit four-year institutions, and tripled at public four-year institutions.

Image that… University presidents who want new buildings and higher salaries and dramatically larger administrative staffs. College Professors who also want higher salaries, and of course “need” to spend less time in the classroom so they can write those high-priced books, do more research and work a few more private consulting gigs. All that requires LOTS more cash. Good thing those students keep scarfing up those federally subsidized and guaranteed loans and passing it along.

Who could have possibly predicted that pumping an extra $1.6 Trillion into the higher education industry would cause prices to rise? YOU could have! ANYBODY with the most rudimentary grasp of Supply and Demand could have.

Which brings me to the third and most powerful S – Stupidity.

OK, I know. Stupidity is a strong word. Sadly, it is not inappropriate. Stick with me through the following example which is anything but rare. Student X gets accepted into a private college with median annual tuition and fees of $35,000. That gets paid for 50% out of pocket and 50% with a loan. At graduation, X will owe $70K to be repaid over 10 years with 5% interest or $742/month.

X gets a degree in, let’s say, Counselling Psychology, and lands a job in this field which has a median income of $32,000. Not likely X can actually get that much right out of school, but let’s go with it; and take a look at X’s monthly cash flow using expense numbers that are on the low side of realistic.

  • Income $2,667
  • FICA & Medicare ($204)   (…the Feds are first in line to garnish your paycheck!)
  • Rent ($1,200)  (…a really low budget apartment)
  • Transportation  ($500)
  • Health Care ($225)
  • Food ($500)

OK, let’s pause here to note that X now has $38 left. $38. What about that $742/month student loan? And the inevitable, unexpected expenses? And maybe a few bucks to have some fun? Ummmmm. Nothing left for any of that. Nothing.

Did X think about any of this before heading off to college? Apparently not. That loan wasn’t actually Other People’s Money, but it sure as hell looked like it! X made a stupid financial decision with what looked like OPM. Is this financial analysis too complex for mere mortals? No! NOITISNOT! Anyone who passed 5th Grade arithmetic can do it in 10 minutes.

But why worry about the future when the federal government is ready to help you get loads of easy money right now???!!!

Sorry, but in a sane world, NOT doing such a simple analysis is stupid. And worse yet, there’s yet another aspect of this scenario that sets a whole new vicious, negative cycle in motion.

For the record, I’m not picking on Counselling Psychology majors. I use them as my example because according to NPR’s Planet Money, it is the #1 least lucrative college major. There are lots and lots of other potential majors that are equally noble, but pretty much just as un-lucrative. I’m not saying, “Don’t major in one of them.” I am saying, ”Don’t expect to be able to pay your bills if all you’ve got is one of those degrees.”

Anyway… Demand for Counselling Psychology skills is low and therefore the jobs are few and the salaries are also low. The only jobs available are with employers who can find the money to pay the new Counselling Psychology graduates. And where does the money to pay someone with these skills come from? Why it comes from federally guaranteed student loans! Thanks, federal government!

Let’s reiterate – and be very clear about the vicious, negative cycle created by easy money from federally guaranteed student loans:

  1. Because great gobs of student loan money is available to pursue large numbers of very un-lucrative degrees…
  2. Large numbers of students decide to borrow to do so…
  3. Which increases demand for teachers of those un-lucrative disciplines…
  4. Which provides an incentive to train even more people in the un-lucrative field…
  5. Who in turn can only find work training still more people in the un-lucrative field…
  6. Who pay for that training with yet another student loan that probably won’t get paid back

I dare I say, that is really stupid.

Can you think of any other un-lucrative fields of study? Let me rephrase that question. How horrified are you to contemplate the fact that tax dollars are GUSHING into a huge number of these educational black holes?

And now all these Presidential Candidates are suggesting what??? Forgive all the outstanding student loans and moving forward, have taxpayers pick up the entire tab to educate thousands and thousands of additional people – literally anybody and everybody – with skills that may have little or no marketable value? Seriously?

Congress blindly threw money in the general vicinity of a legitimate problem – insufficient educational levels for the 21st Century economy – missed the mark – created a massive, new and additional problem – and now they want We the People to authorize blindly throwing even more money in the same general vicinity? Do we look that stupid? ARE we that stupid?

I’m your Intentionally Vicarious host Todd Youngblood – Painfully aware that Congress will continue to ignore the Law of Supply and Demand – will continue to ignore the Self-Interested actions of those who can get their hands on federally provided “other people’s money” – will continue to ignore the sheer Stupidity of the decisions we all make when spending “other people’s money” – I also realize that I owe you thoughts not only on how to address the Student Loan Debacle, but also on how to help us all acquire the advanced and specialized knowledge we need to compete in the global economy – And excited that doing so will contribute to me continuing to have more fun than anyone else I know.

If this episode got your brain working and/or your blood pumping, please tell all your friends and colleagues about it. Send them a link to the episode and/or show them how to subscribe to the Intentionally Vicarious podcast on their phones.

And finally, please consider visiting and making a donation to one of the genuinely worthy causes listed there. Generously donating some part of your hard-earned money is fundamental to having more fun than anyone else you know.

Thanks for paying attention!

Join the discussion 2 Comments

  • Don Abernathy says:

    The Federal government under Obama took over the student loan lending from the banks in 2010 and I think you will find that it has grown considerably in outstanding loans and past dues. You are correct in that it was too good a deal for the banks to pass up guaranteed debt but I believe it was run better by private interests than it is being run by the government.

    • Don – I was under the impression that banks, while no longer providing the actual funding, were still doing the admin side of things. I guess I got that wrong. Would love to pick your brain over the holidays and get your perspective. A follow-up episode might be in order. In any case, our pals in Washington have certainly mucked this one up and are making noise about throwing even more good money after the bad!

Leave a Reply